Blog

These two centenarian sport cartridges have been utilized by hunters and marksmen alike, affording good accuracy at distance, with modest felt recoil and comparatively light-weight actions and barrels. Each rounds are so standard that the majority of your favourite bolt weapons have been chambered in them: The Remington 700, Tikka T3, Savage 110, Weatherby Mark V, and dozens of different rifles from Howa, Mauser, Christensen Arms, Mossberg, Sig, Kimber, and the like supply tactical and searching rifles in .270 and .308.

.270 Winchester is Higher, but it surely May not Matter

The .308 camp can be mad at this assertion of truth. However, oh properly: Though .308 Winchester — and its navy counterpart, 7.62×51 NATO — is by far the extra standard cartridge (and nonetheless one of the standard rifle cartridges, ever) it’s the smaller, sooner .270 Winchester that gives superior efficiency. However whether or not this efficiency even issues is debatable. Let’s clarify.

.270 Winchester Specs

Bullet Diameter: .277″
Case Size: 2.54″
General Size: 3.34″
Case Capability: 67 gr H2O
Frequent Weights: 90, 130, 140, 150 grains

.308 Winchester Specs

Bullet Diameter: .308″
Case Size: 2.015″
General Size: 2.8″
Case Capability: 56 gr H2O
Frequent Weights: 125, 150, 168, 175, 185 grains

.270 Winchester: Temporary Historical past

Although .308 Winchester is taken into account archaic by some, .270 Winchester predates it by at the very least twenty years. The smaller cartridge was invented when Winchester’s engineers necked down the .30-06 cartridge, capped it with a .277 bullet to acquire efficiency much like the 7mm Mauser, and chambered it of their then-new bolt motion, the Mannequin 54, with an motion based mostly closely on the Mauser 98 motion. The Mannequin 54 was Winchester’s first profitable civilian manufacturing bolt gun.

Despite its excessive velocity and flat trajectory, the .270 Winchester wasn’t acquired with huge favor. It wasn’t till Jack O’Conner, famed huge sport hunter and literary, praised the cartridge for its accuracy and efficiency within the subject.

.308 Winchester: Temporary Historical past

The .308 Winchester is the civilian counterpart to the 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge. Developed within the Fifties, the short-action .30-caliber cartridge was made to shave weight and supply increased capability for intermediate service rifles. In 1952, Winchester developed the .208 Winchester and marketed the cartridge to American hunters. Though equivalent at look, the .308 Winchester is a warmer cartridge. It’s loaded to increased pressures with a thinner casing wall.

Due to this, .308 Winchester-chambered rifles can safely shoot 7.62×51 NATO — however the inverse isn’t true; NATO chambers shouldn’t be loaded with .308 Winchester. In contrast to the .270 Winchester’s sluggish adoption, .308 Winchester shortly grew to become one of the standard rifle cartridges ever made. It was, on the time, considered one of just some short-action rounds that afforded smaller actions and lighter rifles, whereas offering excessive velocity and comparatively little bullet drop out to 300 yards.

.270 Win vs .308 Win Ballistics

Like we stated earlier, .270 Winchester is objectively a superior spherical when in comparison with .308 Winchester: It affords much less bullet drop at comparable distances, with increased power and higher ballistic coefficients. However is its long-action requirement definitely worth the added efficiency? Let’s crunch the numbers.

150-Grain Masses In contrast

Evaluating these cartridges’ equivalent grain weights provides us the perfect image — however needless to say 150 grains is concerning the restrict of what .270 cartridges can deal with; that is thought-about center of the street for .308 Winchester.

.270 Winchester

Muzzle Velocity: 2,830 fps
Vitality @ 300 yds: 1,709 ft-lb
Drop @ 300 yds: 12.8 inches

.308 Winchester

Muzzle Velocity: 2,840 fps
Vitality @ 300 yds: 1,565 lb. ft.
Drop @ 300 yds: 13.4 inches

Off the bat, we will see each rounds have virtually equivalent muzzle velocities. However, as a result of .270’s lighter, it retains extra of its preliminary power downrange and winds up retaining 144 lb. ft. of power at 300 yards — that’s about 10% extra energy on the most distance that folk really feel snug taking pictures at sport. Bullet drop can be negligable; .270 Win beats out .308 with about half an inch (4.5%) much less drop at 300 yards.

If we observe .308’s path out to 500 yards, we discover it nonetheless solely suffers marginally worse efficiency: About 7% extra bullet drop, at 3.9″, and it retains about 15% much less energy, or 188 lb. ft. However its the variations in wind drift that illustrate how .270 Winchester excels downrange.

Past simply 100 yards, .270 Win suffers between 15% and 20% much less wind drift, which equates to about 5″ of drift at 500 yards. That’s not insignificant, significantly for those who’re taking pictures at typical 12″ silhouettes. We are able to additionally infer this distinction solely grows to grow to be downright problematic for .308 Winchester at 800 to 1,000 yards, considerably impacting comparative hit likelihood for the NATO-born cartridge.

Heavier .308 Good points an Edge

Heavier grain weights can compensate for one caliber’s comparatively inferior efficiency. One in every of .308’s heaviest hundreds, 178 grains, suffers poorer muzzle velocity, but it surely offers marginally higher power retention and considerably improved bullet drop. Let’s evaluate once more:

.270 Winchester (150-grain)

Muzzle Velocity: 2,830 fps
Vitality @ 300 yds: 1,709 ft-lb
Drop @ 300 yds: 12.8 inches

.308 Winchester (178-grain)

Muzzle Velocity: 2,600 FPS
Vitality @ 300 yds: 1,792 lb. ft.
Drop @ 300 yds: 8.8 inches

On the 300-yard measurement, we discover 178-grain .308 offers about 83 lb. ft. (roughly 5%) extra power than .270 Winchester’s 150-grain load. Bullet drop is improved noticeably, although. The .308 drops 4 inches much less, a roughly 31% discount.

Is .270 Actually Superior?

Virtually talking, 270 Winchester is just marginally higher than .308 Winchester. Inside 300 yards — the distances that just about all hunters take their pictures — the 2 rounds are so intently matched that both cartridge’s bullet drop and wind drift offers no significant benefit over the opposite, no matter grain weight.

At long-range distances, .270 Winchester offers noticeably higher wind drift resistance and reasonably improved bullet drop; briefly, it shooters flatter. However then the argument that there are far superior short- and long-action cartridges to choose for this sort of taking pictures — like all of the 6.5mm sequence hundreds developed over the previous 30 years — enters the dialogue (however that’s a subject for an additional day).

So, we glance to the non-performance subjects which may sway you to think about .270 over .308. It’s right here that you just would possibly discover causes to stay with .308.

Felt Recoil

Felt recoil goes to .308 Winchester — however once more, each are intently matched when taking a look at comparable grain weights. In an 8-pound rifle, a 130-grain .270 Win load generates about 18 lb. ft. of recoil power. The lightest .308 load (125 grains) generates simply 9 kilos of recoil power, whereas the frequent 165-grain load generates 18.1 lb. ft. of power; mainly equivalent to the .270.

Terminal Efficiency

It’s inarguably that, until a lighter spherical is travelling considerably sooner, it’s the larger spherical that produces an even bigger gap. The .308’s heaviest hundreds to, in truth, punch sport with extra power and extra bullet as well. Though .270 is completely able to taking most antlered sport with no chase ensuing, the .308 could drop a big bull elk or moose extra successfully.

Brief vs. Lengthy Motion Weapons

Brief-action rifles are merely cheaper, lighter, and simpler to shoot, and there’s a professional argument for sticking with .308 Winchester for that reason alone. Certain, the argument could be made {that a} lengthy motion soaks up extra felt recoil — however on this case, .308 wins with a typically softer punch to the shoulder, anyway.

Value Per Spherical

At publication, .308 Winchester stays the most well-liked and generally offered .30-caliber rifle spherical available on the market. It’ll probably stay extra inexpensive on a per-round price foundation than .270 Winchester, properly, eternally.

The typical price per spherical for .308 ranges between $0.66 and $0.90 for typical FMJ brass, whereas Match Grade ammo common $2.00 to $2.50 per spherical.

The present price per spherical for typical FMJ .270 ranges between $0.90 and $1.50, whereas Match Grade hundreds common about $2.00 to $3.00 per spherical.

Virtually Talking, It’s a Wash

It’s true that .270 Win outperforms .308 Win on paper — significantly the place wind drift is anxious, particularly at higher distances. However the benefits gained in ballistic efficiency with the latter are a moot within the context of most sensible functions:

Each rounds are made for searching, the place just about all pictures can be taken properly inside 300 yards. Right here, .308 Winchester’s marginally worse ballistic efficiency is negligible and, in truth, its heavier hundreds would possibly present higher efficiency, plus extra knockdown energy.

Couple these information with the opposite advantages .308 offers — higher felt recoil with lighter hundreds, some great benefits of a brief motion, arguably higher terminal efficiency, and a decrease common price per spherical — and also you would possibly conclude it’s higher to stay with the bigger of the 2 cartridges. On this case, .270 Winchester could solely be preferable for those who’re typically ringing metal past 500 yards.

After all, the standard of the rifle issues as a lot because the spherical. Try MDT’s new TIMBR Frontier Inventory, made for the .270- and .308-chambered Remington 700, Tikka T3, and Tikka T1X.